Unrealistic patient expectations for wait times can lead to poor satisfaction. This study’s dual purpose was: (1) to address disparities between patients’ perceived priority level and the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) assigned by emergency room triage nurses; and (2) to evaluate validity and reliability of using the Patient Perception of Priority to be Seen Survey (PPPSS) to investigate patient expectations for emergency department urgency.
A two-group pretest-posttest quasi-experimental approach compared patient urgency opinions to nurse urgency ratings with and without a scripted educational intervention. This tested how closely patient perceptions were related to triage nurse ratings.
Reliability for the PPPSS was acceptable (reliability = 0.75). Patients who were rated lower urgency on the ESI by triage nurses tended to self-report higher urgency (rho = −0.44, P < .01). Attitudes were more consistent in the posttest patient group who were exposed to the scripted verbal description of emergency department procedures (χ2 (1, N = 352) = 8.09, P < .01). Patients who disagreed with emergency nurse scores tended to be younger on average (eg, < 40 years old; rho = 0.69, P < .01). Male identified patients tended to be rated both by nurses and themselves as higher urgency (beta = 0.18, P = .02).
We recommend the PPPSS for nurses and researchers to quickly assess patient expectations. Additionally, promoting patient understanding through a scripted educational strategy about the ESI system may also result in improvements in communication between patients and nurses.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Journal of Emergency Nursing
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- The Definitive Guide to Emergency Department Operational Improvement: Employing Lean Principles With Current ED Best Practices to Create the “No Wait” Department.2nd ed. Productivity Press, 2019
- Implementation handbook 2020 edition emergency severity index: a triage tool for emergency department care version 4. Emergency Nurses Association.https://www.ena.org/docs/default-source/education-document-library/triage/esi-implementation-handbook-2020.pdf?sfvrsn=fdc327df_4Date accessed: May 2, 2018
- Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare.Williams & Wilkins, 2005
- Ambulance use is associated with higher self-rated illness seriousness: user attitudes and perceptions.Acad Emerg Med. 2013; 20: 576-583https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12149
- Emergency department patient satisfaction: examining the role of acuity.Acad Emerg Med. 2018; 11: 162-168https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2003.08.018
- Wait times, patient satisfaction scores, and the perception of care.Am J Manag Care. 2014; 20: 393-400
- Improving the wait time to consultation at the emergency department.BMJ Open Qual. 2018; 7e000131https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000131
- Overall emergency department rating: identifying the factors that matter to patient experience.J Healthc Qual. 2018; 40: 367-376https://doi.org/10.1097/jhq.0000000000000129
- A systematic approach to evaluation of performance deficiencies in ED Triage.J Emerg Nurs. 2017; 43: 329-332https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2017.01.003
- Improving the wait time for consultation at the emergency department.BMJ Open Qual. 2018; 7e000131https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000131
- Effects of triage education on knowledge, practice and qualitative index of emergency room staff: a quasi-interventional study.Bull Emerg Trauma. 2013; 1: 69-75
- Agreement between triage category and patient’s perception of priority in emergency departments.Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016; 24: 126https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0316-2
- The psychology of waiting lines.http://davidmaister.com/articles/5/52/Date accessed: May 2, 2018
- Patients’ perceptions of cultural factors affecting the quality of their medical encounters.Health Expect. 2005; 8: 4-17https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00298.x
- Reliability and validity of scores on the emergency severity index version 3.Acad Emerg Med. 2004; 11: 59-65https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2003.06.013
- Inter-rater agreement of emergency nurses and physicians in emergency severity index (ESI) Triage.Emerg (Tehran). 2014; 2: 158-161
- Performance of triage systems in emergency care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ Open. 2019; 9e026471https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026471
- Outcomes for emergency severity index triage implementation in the Emergency Department.J Clin Diagn Res. 2015; 9: OC04-OC7https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2015/11791.5737
- AMA Manual of Style Committee. Updated guidance on the reporting of race and ethnicity in medical and science journals.JAMA. 2021; 326: 621-627https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.13304
- Psychometrics: an Introduction.Sage Publications, 2008
- Measurement and the Measurement of Change: A Primer for the Health Professions.Wolters Kluwer, 2016
- Generalizability theory as a unifying framework of measurement reliability in adolescent research.J Early Adolesc. 2014; 34: 38-65https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431613482044
- G ∗Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39: 175-191https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
- The Essence of Multivariate Thinking: Basic Themes and Methods.2nd ed. Routledge, 2014: 130-155
- Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988
- Introduction to power analysis: a guide to G∗Power, jamovi, and superpower.https://osf.io/zqphw/Date accessed: February 9, 2022
- Sex bias in the assessment of patient complaints.J Fam Pract. 1983; 16: 1117-1121
- Complaints with encounters in healthcare–men’s experiences.Scand J Caring Sci. 2012; 26: 279-286https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00930.x
- Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review.BMC Med Ethics. 2017; 18: 19https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0179-8
- Are there gender differences in pain perception?.J Neurosci Nurs. 2006; 38: 172-176https://doi.org/10.1097/01376517-200606000-00006
- Sex differences in pain perception.Gend Med. 2005; 2: 137-145https://doi.org/10.1016/s1550-8579(05)80042-7
- Socioeconomic status and dissatisfaction with health care among chronically ill African Americans.Am J Public Health. 2003; 93: 742-748https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.93.5.742
- US Emergency Department performance on wait time and length of visit.Ann Emerg Med. 2010; 55: 133-141https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.07.023
- Benefits of a slideshow with nature pictures and music in the emergency department waiting room-a pilot study.Eur J Person Centered Healthc. 2019; 7: 344-350https://doi.org/10.5750/ejpch.v7i2.1682
Joshua Ray Tanzer is a Biostatistician, Lifespan Biostatistics, Epidemiology, Research Design, Informatics Core, Providence, RI.
Marlene Dufault is Professor and Nursing Consultant, University of Rhode Island, Department of Nursing, Kingston, RI.
Linda Roderick Rioux is Staff Nurse Newport Hospital Emergency Department, Department of Emergency Medicine, Newport, RI.
Jason Machan is Director of the Lifespan ClinTECH Center and Lifespan Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design Core, Providence, RI.
Kathy Bergeron is Clinical Nurse Educator, Newport Hospital and Adjunct Faculty, Department of Nursing, Salve Regina University, Newport, RI.
Anthony Napoli is Professor of Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Warren Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University and Chair, Department of Emergency Medicine, Newport Hospital Emergency Department, Newport, RI.
Published online: December 23, 2022
© 2022 Emergency Nurses Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.