« Previous
Next »
Journal of Emergency Nursing
Volume 36, Issue 4
, Pages 317-323
, July 2010
Barriers to Change Hindering Quality Improvement: The Reality of Emergency Care
References
- . Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;3:CD004563
- . Undertreatment of acute pain in the emergency department: a challenge. Int J Qual Health Care. 2005;17:173–176
- . Giving a voice to the community: a qualitative study of consumer expectations for the emergency department. Emerg Med (Fremantle). 2003;15:369–375
- . The effect of emergency department crowding on patient satisfaction for admitted patients. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15:825–831
- . Patient expectations of emergency department care: phase II—a cross-sectional survey. Can J Emerg Med Care. 2006;8:148–157
- . Patients' perceptions of quality of care at an emergency department and identification of areas for quality improvement. J Clin Nurs. 2006;15:1045–1056
- . Integrated care for patients with a stroke in the Netherlands: results and experiences from a national Breakthrough Collaborative Improvement project. Int J Integrated Care. 2005;5:1–12
- Developing and implementing new safe practices: voluntary adoption through statewide collaboratives. Qual Safety Health Care. 2006;15:289–295
- . How to improve. http://www.ihi.org/IHI/Topics/Improvement/ImprovementMethods/HowToImprove/Accessed August 31, 2008
- . An exploration of the factors that influence the implementation of evidence into practice. J Clin Nurs. 2004;13:913–924
- . Quality improvement: the divergent views of managers and clinicians. J Nurs Manage. 2007;15:43–50
- . Healthcare provider complaints to the emergency department: a preliminary report on a new quality improvement instrument. Qual Safety Health Care. 2006;15:344–346
- . Quality of care: development of a patient-centered questionnaire based on a grounded theory model. Scand J Caring Sci. 1994;8:39–48
- . Qualitative Research for Nurses. United Kingdom: Blackwell Science Ltd; 1996;
- . Analyzing & Reporting Focus Group Results [Focus Group Kit 6]. Thousands Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1998;
- . Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24:105–112
- SFS 2003:460. Lag om etikprövning av forskning som avser människor [Act concerning the ethical review of research involving humans]. http://www.regeringen.se/. Accessed June 18, 2009.
- . Declaration of Helsinki. http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htmAccessed August 31, 2008
- CODEX—regler och riktlinjer för forskning [CODEX—Rules and guidelines for research]. http://www.codex.uu.se/. Accessed June 18, 2009.
- . Keeping the spirit high: why trauma team training is (sometimes) implemented. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;52:437–441
- . Understanding how organizational culture shapes research use. J Nurs Adm. 2005;35:359–365
- . What is “quality improvement” and how can it transform healthcare?. Qual Safety Health Care. 2007;16:2–3
- . The Victorian emergency department collaboration. Int J Qual Health Care. 2002;14:463–470
- . Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges. Implement Sci. 2008;3:1–12
- . Evidence-informed practice: from individual to context. J Nurs Manage. 2008;16:404–408
Earn Up to 8.5 CE Hours. See page 392.
☆ This study was funded through a Karin Olsson Scholarship from the Swedish Association of Health Professionals. No known conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, exist.
PII: S0099-1767(09)00423-1
doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2009.09.003
© 2010 Emergency Nurses Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Emergency Nursing
Volume 36, Issue 4
, Pages 317-323
, July 2010
