Journal of Emergency Nursing
Volume 36, Issue 4 , Pages 317-323, July 2010

Barriers to Change Hindering Quality Improvement: The Reality of Emergency Care

Uppsala, Sweden

Received 12 February 2009; received in revised form 30 July 2009; accepted 2 September 2009. published online 09 November 2009.

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate physicians' and nurses' perspectives and prerequisites for quality improvement in the emergency department based on results from a previous patient survey.

Method

The study used an explorative design with a qualitative approach and was conducted at the main emergency department of a Swedish university hospital. Interviews were conducted with 5 focus groups. In total, the groups comprised 22 respondents.

Results

The respondents suggested goals and quality improvements, such as more patient-centered care, reduced waiting times, and better pain management. However, barriers to quality improvement also were identified and represented 3 themes: the patient is looked upon as an object or a problem; the physicians and nurses belong to different organizational cultures; and the hospital's organization hinders the optimal flow of patients and improvements to quality.

Discussion

When assigning priority to the topic areas, most of the focus groups ranked “information, respect, and empathy” as most important to improve. Adequate information, proper care, and treatment within a reasonable time in the emergency department were cited as the goals for patient care, but the health care professionals perceived barriers to change in the hospital culture and organization. To ensure quality care and patient safety, these barriers should be addressed by leaders on all levels in the organization, including the hospital board. Health care professionals' perspectives of quality of care are valuable and should be included in quality improvement work.

Key words: Barriers to change, Focus group interview, Emergency department, Quality improvement, Health care professionals' perspective

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Earn Up to 8.5 CE Hours. See page 392.

 This study was funded through a Karin Olsson Scholarship from the Swedish Association of Health Professionals. No known conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, exist.

PII: S0099-1767(09)00423-1

doi:10.1016/j.jen.2009.09.003

Journal of Emergency Nursing
Volume 36, Issue 4 , Pages 317-323, July 2010