Journal of Emergency Nursing
Volume 34, Issue 1 , Pages 3-5 , February 2008

Research, Quality Improvement, and Institutional Review Boards: What's The Deal?

References 

  1. Bankert EA, Amdur RJ. Institutional review board management and function. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2002;
  2. National Institutes of Health. Office of Human Subjects Research. Bethesda, MD, 2007. Available at: http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/index.htmlAccessed October 7, 2007
  3. Mitty E. The ethics of using QI methods to improve healthcare quality and safety. J Nurs Care Qual. 2007;22:97–101
  4. Newhouse RP, Pettit JC, Poe S, Rocco L. The slippery slope: differentiating between quality improvement and research. J Nurs Admin. 2006;36:211–219
  5. Baily MA, Bottrell M, Lynn J, Jennings B. The ethics of using QI methods to improve health quality and safety. Hastings Cent Rep. 2006;36:S1
  6. Cassarret D, Karlawish JHT, Sugarman J. Determining when quality improvement initiatives should be considered research: proposed criteria and potential implications. JAMA. 2000;283:2275–2280

 Linda J. Scheetz and Kathy Oman are Senior Research Editors for JEN.

PII: S0099-1767(07)00583-1

doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2007.10.006

Journal of Emergency Nursing
Volume 34, Issue 1 , Pages 3-5 , February 2008