Journal of Emergency Nursing
Volume 33, Issue 4 , Pages 319-323, August 2007

Triage Tool Inter-rater Reliability: A Comparison of Live Versus Paper Case Scenarios

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

published online 22 June 2007.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.

 This study was presented at the 2005 Society of Academic Emergency Medicine Annual Meeting, May 22-25, 2005, New York, NY; the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians Annual Scientific Meeting, May 30, 2005, Edmonton, Alberta; and the ENA Annual Conference, Nashville, Tenn, September 14-17, 2005.Funded by a research grant to Dr. Andrew Worster from the Hamilton Emergency Services Network, Hamilton Ontario, Canada.

 Authors' noteThis study has been published in abstract form as follows:Sardo A, Worster A, Fernandes CMB, Eva K, Upadhye S. Triage tool inter-rater reliability using live cases vs. paper case scenarios. Acad Emerg Med 2005;12:137.Worster A, Sardo A, Fernandes CMB, Eva K, Upadhye S. Triage tool inter-rater reliability using live cases vs. paper case scenarios. Can J Emerg Med 2005;7:209.Worster A, Sardo A, Fernandes C, Eva K, Upadhye S. Triage tool inter-rater reliability using live cases vs. paper case scenarios. J Emerg Nurs 2005;31:426.

PII: S0099-1767(06)00765-3

doi:10.1016/j.jen.2006.12.016

Journal of Emergency Nursing
Volume 33, Issue 4 , Pages 319-323, August 2007

Article Tools